Wow. It’s like she’s not even running. Possible explanations: A) She’s too embarrassed by her low turnout B) She doesn’t like to be around the Plebes C) She’s got serious health issues D) She doesn’t feel she needs to campaign or E) All of the above
If you’ve been on the internet lately, you’ve been inundated with pussy. In the media’s eyes, Trump’s private conversation with Billy Bush was as spectacular as the bombing of Pearl Harbor. While I don’t condone his comments, I certainly don’t feel that I was privy to the conversation, nor do I have any clue if that is indeed the way boys talk in private. What I do know is that it certainly paled in comparison to Clinton’s deeds.
What really miffed me was how quickly the slimy House Speaker Paul Ryan made a big publicity stunt about it. Suddenly, he’s become this Political Puritan who condemns his own party’s candidate, yet bows his head in reverence to the corruption of the pussy candidate. He’s got to keep the one-party system running come hell or high water. Basically, he’s pussy whipped.
So the big night comes, and what does Trump do? Right before the debate, he holds a presser with all the pussies Bill Clinton raped, and the one whose rapist Hillary got acquitted. Ole Bill squirmed when surrounded by these particular pussies during the debate.
As far as the debate, only a few dimwitted Dems and Clinton News Network believe Clinton won. She didn’t. Trump won because he isn’t a pussy.
There is a reason that Trump has thousands of people come to see him while Clinton can’t fill up a high school gymnasium: Most Americans are sick and tired of the pussification of America.
Tonight I’ll be going to see Trump cuz I’m jes an ignorant, racist, islamophobe, homophobic bigot who dun’t deserve to have a friend or be redeemed by Our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ. Yeah, I got one word for that: Meow.
Sometimes, the best thing about an article is the comments. After reading about another Muslim atrocity in Europe, a commenter stated that it was all a part of Kalergi’s Plan. Since I didn’t know who Kalergi was, I was curious to find out about him and his plan. When I searched Kalergi, the image I clicked on was this:
After doing some reading about this fella, I have come to believe he had one of the original visions of a New World Order, whereby all peoples would live equally as one mixed race to be governed by an intelligent, well-mannered aristocracy. I believe that he believed in this Utopia (Of course, it didn’t hurt that he was being backed monetarily by some of the very same Jewish bankers who envisioned a global banking system, and encouraged Wilson to pass the Federal Reserve Act. )
Ironically, this movement was put on hold by someone who also believed in a different Utopia: One race to be ruled by himself as sole leader – Adolf Hitler.
Now, fast forward to the 21st century, we see the seeds that were sown by Kalergi continue to this day. There is a Coudenhove-Kalergi European Prize that is bestowed every two years upon those who promote his vision. In 2010, Federal Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel, won the award. In 2012, President of European Council, Herman Van Rompuy won the award. Guess you could agree they earned their awards.
Because the Europeans are foreign to individual liberty, they have been relatively naive during the steady invasion of their lands. Fortunately, the citizens are waking up (albeit slowly) to just how peaceful these migrants really are. The peoples’ concerns have little to no bearing on their leaders as they are far removed from the riff-raff. They’re kind of like those leaders in South America and Africa; they know that famine and/or disease is its own form of eugenics. Those who survive are docile enough to control.
Hopefully, this synopsis has given you a glimpse of the big picture. I read this 9-part series on Cudenhove-Kalergi, and it goes into much more detail about the man:
A lil sumpin, sumpin before I fly…. http://www.voxday.net/mart/TIA_free.pdf
A few posts back, I was lamenting the fact that the only source for real news was via the internet. Now that Obama may possibly hand it over to the UN, what could possibly go wrong?
When I first heard about this a coupla years back, I thought it must not be anything important. Being the technological genius that I’m not, I didn’t realise the impact of a domain name. The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, is basically a registered phonebook of internet users.
ICANN inherited WHOIS, and WHOIS protocol remains largely unchanged since 1999 – in spite of over a decade of task forces, working groups and studies, and changes in privacy laws. As a result, WHOIS is at the center of long-running debate and study at ICANN, among other Internet governance institutions, and in the global Internet community.
That last paragraph from the ICANN website pretty much sums up what the conflicts of interest will be should any rules of the internet be decided by multiple countries.
Consider this: If Zuckerberg can decide what is acceptable on Facebook, and Kordestani can decide what is abusive on Twitter, then who will decide what is read and said outside of private domains?
We already know that the NY times called on Google to put an end to “Hillary’s health” searches . So the new First Amendment is that you’re free to proclaim death wishes to Trump, but cannot question Her Majesty’s well-being. (Free to think as we).
In essence, we are living in a dystopian novel; Thought Police, et al. I reckon it may be time for folks to become reacquainted with the Ham radio……